iNaturalist: citizen science for teaching and learning sciences.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2025.v22.i3.3201

Info

Experiences, resources and other work
3201
Published: 21-09-2025
PlumX

Authors

Abstract

The phenomenon known as plant blindness, sometimes defined as the inability of people to perceive, recognise and appreciate plants, has been described as one of the biggest challenges we face as science educators in tackling the socio-ecological crisis we live in these times. Fostering positive human-plant relationships is the responsibility of teachers. A didactic intervention was designed, implemented and evaluated. The aim was to bring the world of botany closer to future teachers (University of Extremadura). During a whole semester, the participants took photos of different botanical species using the mobile application iNaturalist. This activity, which was voluntary and evaluable, involved 61 students (87 % female), 80.3% of the total enrolled, who contributed a total of 1829 observations (mostly of plants). Of these, 156 have so far reached research grade, which means that they have become scientific contributions with potential use for scientific knowledge. The student’s evaluation, carried out by using a rubric (attached), gave very positive results for this activity. Finally, we reflect on the potential benefits of integrating citizen science into formal education.

Keywords


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Supporting Agencies  

Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 mediante el proyecto PID2020-115214RB-I00.

How to Cite

Blanco-Salas, J., & Hernández-Barco, M. A. (2025). iNaturalist: citizen science for teaching and learning sciences . Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación De Las Ciencias, 22(3), 3201. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2025.v22.i3.3201

References

Abadal, E. (2021). Ciencia abierta: un modelo con piezas por encajar. ARBOR, 197(799), 1-12.

Aceves-Bueno, E., Adeleye, A. S., Feraud, M., Huang, Y., Tao, M., Yang, Y. y Anderson, S. E. (2017). The accuracy of citizen science data: a quantitative review. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 98, 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1336

Aguilera, D. (2018). La salida de campo como recurso didáctico para enseñar ciencias. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Eureka, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3103

Anđelković, S., Dedjanski, V. y Pejic, B. (2018). Pedagogical benefits of fieldwork of the students at the Faculty of Geography in the light of the Bologna Process. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1379058

Aristeidou, M., Lorke, J. y Ismail, N. (2022). Citizen Science: Schoolteachers’ Motivation, Experiences, and Recommendations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 2067-2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10340-z

Blanco-Salas, J., Tortonda, P. y Sánchez-Gullón, E. (2023). Ciencia ciudadana como herramienta para avanzar en el conocimiento botánica: el caso de Jacaranda Mimosifolia D. Don (BIGNONIACEAE) en la provicia de Huelva (España). Folia Botanica Extremadurensis, 17, 83-89.

Barni, D., Danioni, F. y Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of personal values and motivations for teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(7), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645

Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., Kelemen, E., Kopperoinen, L., Herzele, A., Keune, H., Hecker, S., Suškevičs, M., Roy, H., Itkonen, P., Külvik, M., László, M., Basnou, C., Pino, J. y Bonn, A. (2016). Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12762

Bonney, R., Phillips, T., Ballard, H. L. y Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2-16.

Borrachero, A.B., Brígido, M., Costillo, E., Bermejo, M.L. y Mellado, V. (2013). Relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and emotions of future teachers of Physics in secondary education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 1-11.

Bravo-Lucas, E., Costillo, E., Bravo, J.L., Mellado, V. y Conde, C. (2022). Analysis of prospective early childhood education teachers’ proposals of nature field trips: An educational experience to bring nature close during this stage. Science Education, 106(1), 172-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21689

Campbell, N., Peacock, J. y Bacon K. L. (2023). A repeatable scoring system for assessing Smartphone applications ability to identify herbaceous plants. PLoS ONE, 18(4), e0283386. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283386

Convert, B. (2005). Europa y la crisis de vocaciones científicas. Revista Europea de Formación profesional, 35, 8-12.

Crujeiras, B.P. y Jiménez, M.P. (2015). Desafíos planteados por las actividades abiertas de indagación en el laboratorio: articulación de conocimientos teóricos y prácticos en las prácticas científicas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1469

del Toro, R., y Morcillo, J.G. (2011). Las actividades de campo en educación secundaria. Un estudio comparativo entre Dinamarca y España. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra, 19(1), 39-47.

DeWitt, J. y Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562

Diez-Ojeda, M., Queiruga-Dios, M. y Queiruga-Dios, M. (2024). Appreciation of primary preservice teachers about the potential educational use of citizen science in environmental education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-03-2024-0184

Echeverría, A., Ariz, I., Moreno, J., Peralta, J. y González, E. (2021). Learning Plant Biodiversity in Nature: The Use of the Citizen-Science Platform iNaturalist as a Collaborative Tool in Secondary Education. Sustainability, 13, 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020735

FECYT. (2022). Encuesta de percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Informe de resultados. Departamento de Cultura Científica y de la Innovación de FECYT.

Follet, R. y Strezov, V. (2015). An analyis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PloS One, 11, e0143687.

Gallardo, K. (2020). Competency-based assessment and the use of performance-based evaluation rubrics in higher education: Challenges towards the next decade. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 61-79

García-Berlanga, O. M. (2019). Las plantas como recursos didáctico. La Botánica en la enseñanza de las Ciencias. Flora Montiberica, 73, 93-99.

García-Ruíz, M. y Sánchez, B. (2006). Las actitudes relacionadas con las ciencias naturales y sus repercusiones en la práctica docente de profesores de primaria. Perfiles educativos, 28(114), 61-89.

Guisasola, J. y Morentin, M. (2007). ¿Comprenden la naturaleza de la ciencia los futuros maestros y maestras de Educación Primaria? Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 6(2), 246-262.

Hernández-Barco, M. A., Corbacho-Cuello, I., Sánchez-Martín, J. y Cañada-Cañada, F. (2024). A longitudinal study during scientific teacher training: the association between affective and cognitive dimensions. Frontiers in Education, 9.

Hochmair, H.H., Scheffrahn, R.H., Basille, M. y Boone, M. (2020) Evaluating the data quality of iNaturaliste termite records. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0226534.

Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.

Jordan, R., Ballard, H. y Phillips, T. (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 307–309.

Jose, S. B., Wu, C. H. y Kamoun, S. (2019). Overcoming plant blindness in science, education, and society. Plants, people, planet, 1(3), 169-172.

Kiewra, L., Powell, R., Stern, M., Hemby, T. y Browning, M. (2023). Is naturalness associated with positive learning outcomes during environmental education field trips?. The Journal of Environmental Education, 54, 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2157369

Kızıltaş, E. y Sak, R. (2018). Integrating field-trip activities with other activities in the preschool curriculum: its effects on the preschoolers’ social–emotional skills. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40723-018-0047-0

Kletečki, N., Hruševar, D. Mitić, B. y Šorgo, A. (2023). Plants are Not Boring, School Botany is. Education Sciences, 13(5), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI13050489

Kubiatko, M, Fančovičová, J. y Prokop, P. (2021). Factual knowledge of students about plants is associated with attitudes and interest in botany, International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1426-1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1917790

Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M. y Pietzner, V. (2022). Citizen science and its potential for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 44, 1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2067365

OECD (Ed.). (2024). Programme for International Student Assessment’s (PISA).

Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., Sahlberg, P., Ward, K., Bentsen, P., Curry, C. y Cowper, R. (2022). Getting out of the classroom and into nature: a systematic review of nature-specific outdoor learning on school children's learning and development. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 877058.

Martínez-Sagarra, G., Castilla, F. y Pando, F. (2022). Seven hundred projects in iNaturalist Spain: performance and lessons learned. Sustainability, 14, 11093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711093

Márquez-Corro, J. I., Jiménez-Mejías, P., Fernández-Mazuecos, M., Ramos-Gutiérrez, I., Martín-Hernanz, S., Martín-Bravo, S., Alfaro-Saiz, E., Blanco-Salas, J., Borras, J., Capó, M., Carrera-Bonet, D., de la Fuente Brun, P., Fernández-Lesaga, A., Garnatje, T., Gorriz-Huarte, L., Molino, S., Nualart, N. y Mairal, M. (2021). I Biomaratón de Flora Española: ciencia ciudadana para visibilizar la biodiversidad vegetal. Conservación Vegetal, 25, 33-37.

Mellado, V., Borrachero, B., Melo, L., Dávila-Acedo, M. A., Cañada-Cañada, F., Conde, C., Costillo, E., Cubero, J., Esteban, R., Martínez-Borreguero, G., Ruiz, C., Sánchez, J., Garritz, A., Mellado, L., Vázquez-Bernal, B., Jiménez-Pérez, R. y Bermejo, M.L. (2014). Las emociones en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 32(3), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1478

Mesaglio, T. y Callaghan, C. T. (2021). An overview of the history, current contributions and future outlook of iNaturalist in Australia. Wildlife Research, 48(4), 289-303.

Morag, O. y Tal, T. (2012). Assessing Learning in the Outdoors with the Field Trip in Natural Environments (FiNE) Framework. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 745-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.599046

Nugent, J. (2018). INaturalist. Science Scope, 41(7), 12-13.

Nurutdinova, A.R., Perchatkina, V.G., Zinatullina, L.M., Zubkova, G.I. y Galeeva, F.T. (2016). Innovative teaching practice: Traditional and alternative methods (Challenges and implications). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), 3807-3819.

Parsley, K.M. (2020). Plant Awareness Disparity: A Case for Renaming Plant Blindness. Plants People Planet, 2(6): 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10153

Pedrinaci, E. (2012). Trabajo de campo y aprendizaje de las ciencias. Alambique. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, 71, 81-8.

Pérez, M.C. (2011). Los juegos de mesa en la educación infantil. Pedagogía Magna, 11, 354-359.

Pizarro, M., Mugica, A., Quintana-Buil, M., Miranda, H., Gómez, D., Fuentes, I., Martínez, J., Ibánez, N., Nualart, N. y García, M. B. (2022). Aprendiendo de plantas y compartiendo observaciones con nuevas tecnologías. FLORAPYR y FLORAMON con iNaturalist. Ecosistemas, 31(3), 2379. https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2379

Sánchez-Martín, J., Gallego-Méndez, J., Hernández-Barco, M.A. y Cañada-Cañada, F. (2020). Working on what students think about chemical reactions: a didactic intervention on prior ideas at Primary School Level. En E. J. Byker y A. Horton (Eds.), Elementary Education. Global perspectives, challenges and issues of the 21 st century. (Número July, pp. 287-295). Nova Science Publisher.

Sousa, L., Kenneally, C., Golumbic, Y., Martin, J., Preston, C., Rutledge, P. y Motion, A. (2024). Teacher experiences and understanding of citizen science in Australian classrooms. PLOS ONE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312680

Stroud, S., Fennell, M., Mitchley, J., Lydon, S., Peackock, J. y Bacon, K. (2022). The botanical education extinction and the fall of plant awareness. Ecology and Evolution, 12(7).

Suárez, B. (2018). Whatsapp: su uso educativo, ventajas y desventajas. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 16(2), 121-135.

Vázquez, A. y Manassero, M.A. (2018). Más allá de la comprensión científica: educación científica para desarrollar el pensamiento. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 17(2), 309-336.

Wilhelm, S., Förster, R. y Zimmermann, A. (2019). Implementing Competence Orientation: Towards Constructively Aligned Education for Sustainable Development in University-Level Teaching-And-Learning. Sustainability, 11(7), 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071891

Wu, Y.-J., Kiefer, S. M. y Chen, Y.-H. (2019). Relationships between learning strategies and self-efficacy: A cross-cultural comparison between Taiwan and the United States using latent class analysis. International Journal of School y Educational Psychology, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1566104