Realisative verbs, communicative situation and Searle's declarative acts

Número

Downloads

Article abstract page views:  2920  

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2007.i15.10

Info

Papers
179-199
Published: 01-12-2008
PlumX

Authors

  • Asela Reig Alamillo (FR) Université Stendhal, Grenoble III

Abstract

In this paper, the notion of performative utterance is revisited in order to show that the possibility that a certain ilocutionary verb can be used performatively depends on the communicative context in which the utterance is produced. In this sense, it is shown that colloquial conversations, for example, are a more restrictive context regarding the use of performative verbs than written, more formal exchanges. To account for these data, the concept of “constitutive rule” that explains ilocutionary acts in Searle’s theory is used, and it is argued that the type of speech acts named “declarations” in Searle’s taxonomy should not be considered a type of ilocutionary acts comparable to the other four types in this classification.

Keywords


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Reig Alamillo, A. (2008). Realisative verbs, communicative situation and Searle’s declarative acts. Pragmalingüística, (15-16), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2007.i15.10

References

AUSTIN, J. L. (1962), Cómo hacer cosas con palabras, Barcelona, Paldós, 1982.

BLAKEMORE, D. (1992), Understanding utterances, Oxford, Blackwell.

FERRARA, A. (1980)M "Appropriateness conditions for entire sequences of speech acts", Pragmatics, 4, 321-340.

GARRIDO, J. (1999), "Los actos de habla. Las oraciones imperativas" en Bosque, I. & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, III, Madrid, Espasa, 3879-3928.

GONZÁLEZ RUIZ, R. (2006), "Enunciados performativos y verbos performativos: acerca de la

performatividad como propiedad gradual (con especial referencia al español)", Hesperia: Anuario de Filología Hispánica, IX, 107-126.

MILLER, S. (2000), "Speech acts and conventions", Language Sciences, 22, 155-166.

MOESCHLER, J. (1985), Argumentation et conversation: Eléments pour une analyse pragmatique du discours, París, Hatier/Didier.

PORTOLÉS LÁZARO, J. (2004), Pragmática para hispanistas, Madrid, Síntesis.

RÉCANATI, F. (1987), Meaning and force, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

REIG ALAMILLO, A. (2006), "Una clasificación de los verbos realizativos del español", en Face, T. F. & C. A. Klee. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8 Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 183-190.

SEARLE, J. (1969), Actos de habla. Ensayo de filosofía del lenguaje, Madrid, Cátedra, 2001.

SEARLE, J. (1975), "Una taxonomía de los actos ilocucionarios" en L. M. Valdés Villanueva (comp.) (1991), La búsqueda del significado. Lecturas de filosofía del lenguaje, Madrid, Tecnos, 453-479.

SEARLE, J. (1983), Intencionalidad. Un ensayo de filosofía de la mente, Madrid, Tecnos, 1992.

SEARLE, J. (1989), "How performatives work", Linguistics and philosophy, 12.5, 535-558.

SEARLE, J. (1995), La construcción de la realidad social, Barcelona, Paidós, 1997.

SEARLE, J. (2000), Razones para actuar. Una teoría del libre albedrío, Oviedo, Ed. Nobel.

SEARLE, J. (2001), Mente, lenguaje y sociedad: la filosofía en el mundo real, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1986), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell.