Interprétation et effet de jardinage
Auteurs
- Marisa Díez Arroyo (ES) Universidad de Oviedo
Résumé
Dans cet article on essai de prouver que la théorie de la Pertinance de Sperber & Wilson doit être renforcée avec une théorie psycholinguistique sur le processeur du langage à fin d'expliquer convenablement les doubles sens. L'article présent une analyse comparée (anglais-espagnol) en trois niveaux d'ambiguïté: syntaxique, sémantique et phonétique.
Mots-clés
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Pragmalingüística 2018
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Références
BRESNAN, J. (ed) (1981), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
CARRITHERS, C. (1989), "Syntactic complexity does not necessarily make sentences harder to understand", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18-1, 75-88.
CARSTON, R. (1988) 1990, "Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics". In Kempson, R. (ed) (1988) 1990, Mental Representations, Cambridge, CUP.
COOK, G. (1992), The Discourse of Advertising, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. CHIERCHIA, G. & MCCONNELL-GINET, S. (1990), Meaning and Grammar, Cambridge, Mass., MIT.
DIEZ ARROYO, M. (1995), "Lexical ambiguity in ads", Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 3, 187-200.
FORRESTER. M. (1995), "Tropic implicature and context in the comprehension of idiomatic phrases", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24-1, 1-22.
GAZDAR, G., KLEIN, E., PULLUM, G. & SAG, I. (1985), Generalized Phrase- Structure Grammar, Oxford, Blackwell.
GREEN, G. (1990), "The universality of Gricean interpretation", Berkeley Linguistic Society 16, 411-428.
GRICE, H. P. (1975), "Logic and converstion". In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds) (1975), Syntax and Semantics 3. Pragmatics, New York, Academic Press.
HIRST, G. (1992), Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity, Cambridge, CUP.
HOGABOAM. T. & PERFETTI, C. (1975), "Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 265-274.
JASZCZOLT, K. (1996), "Relevance and infinity: implications for discourse interpretation", Journal of Pragmatics 25, 703-722.
JONES, J. (1989), "Multiple access of homonym meaning: an artifact of backward priming?", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4, 417-432.
KEMPSON, R. (1977) 1992, Semantic Theory, Cambridge, CUP.
KEYNES, J. M. (1921), A Treatise on Probability, London, MacMillan.
LASERSOHN, P. (1993), "Existence presuppositions and background knowledge", Journal of Semantics 10, 113-122.
LEVINAS, E. (1961), Totality and Infinity, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press.
MARCUS, M. (1980), A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
MCCARTHY, M. (1992), "English idioms in use", Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 25, 55-65.
O'NEILL, J. (1988/89), "Relevance and pragmatic inference", Theoretical Linguistics 15-3, 241-261.
RICHARDSON, J. & RICHARDSON, A. (1990), "On predicting pragmatic relations", Berkeley Linguistic Society 16, 498-508.
SPERBER, D. & WILSON, D. (1986), Relevance, Communication and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell.
ΤΑΝΑΚΑ, Κ. (1994), Advertising Language, London, Routledge.
WITTGESTEIN, L. (1978), Philosophical Investigations, Oxford, Blackwell.